mouse immortalized leydig cell lines (ATCC)
Structured Review

Mouse Immortalized Leydig Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 16 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse immortalized leydig cell lines/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 16 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Ethylene dimethanesulfonate effects on gene promoter activities related to the endocrine function of immortalized Leydig cell lines R2C and MA-10"
Article Title: Ethylene dimethanesulfonate effects on gene promoter activities related to the endocrine function of immortalized Leydig cell lines R2C and MA-10
Journal: Current Research in Toxicology
doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2023.100147
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Representative aspect of cells after 24 h of exposure to ethylene dimethanesulfonate (EDS) of rat R2C and mouse MA-10 Leydig cells. Note that at 5 mM, the cell confluency and morphological characteristic seem qualitatively impaired (red arrows; insert), indicating the cytotoxicity caused by EDS. (B) Cell count of R2C and MA-10 cells after 4 and 24 h of EDS exposure at concentrations of 1 or 2 mM (n = 4, each in duplicate). Values are expressed as median (interquartile ranges). Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test (p > 0.05).
Techniques Used: Cell Counting
Figure Legend Snippet: A dose–response study with reporter luciferase assays to determine the effects of EDS on (A) Star , (B) Cyp17a1 , (C) Insl3 , and (D) Gsta3 promoter activity. Rat R2C (n = 4, each in triplicate) and mouse MA-10 (n = 5, each in triplicate) Leydig cells were transfected with different promoter constructs and treated for 24 h with increasing concentrations of EDS as indicated. Luciferase reporter (Luc). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (*p < 0.05 compared to the control group).
Techniques Used: Luciferase, Activity Assay, Transfection, Construct, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: EDS effects on the activity of the Insl3 and Gsta3 gene promoter after 4 and 24 h of exposure to EDS of rat R2C (1 mM of EDS, n = 4–5, each in triplicate) and mouse MA-10 (2 mM of EDS, n = 5, each in triplicate) Leydig cells. Luciferase reporter (Luc). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Welch’s t -test (*p < 0.05).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Luciferase
Figure Legend Snippet: EDS effects on Star promoter activity after 4 h of exposure to EDS of rat R2C (1 mM of EDS, n = 5, each in triplicate) and mouse MA-10 (2 mM of EDS, n = 5, each in triplicate) Leydig cells. EDS effects on Star promoter activity after 24 h of exposure to EDS of rat R2C (1 mM of EDS, n = 3, each in triplicate) and mouse MA-10 (2 mM of EDS, n = 5, each in triplicate) Leydig cells, DC3 granulosa cells (1 mM of EDS, n = 5, each in triplicate), and MSC-1 Sertoli cells (2 mM of EDS, n = 5, each in triplicate). EDS effects were assessed in basal and stimulated (0.5 mM 8Br-cAMP) conditions in R2C Leydig cells. Luciferase reporter (Luc). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Welch’s t -test (*p < 0.05).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Luciferase
Figure Legend Snippet: The EDS-responsive region is located between −400 and −195 bp of the Star promoter. Progressive 5′ deletion constructs of Star gene promoter were transfected in rat R2C Leydig cells and treated with 1 mM EDS for 24 h (n = 3–5, each in triplicate) in the absence or presence of 0.5 mM 8Br-cAMP for 4 h. Luciferase reporter (Luc). Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Welch’s t -test (*p < 0.05).
Techniques Used: Construct, Transfection, Luciferase